Tag Archive | "Stephanie Meyer"

Is Fantasy More Friendly to Female Authors?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


This article was published in January 2010.

The end of the year means one thing for magazines: lists. Lists of bests. Lists of worsts. Lists of tops. Lists of bottoms. Lists of lists. Publisher’s Weekly caused an uproar when they released their list of Top 100 books for 2009. Only 29 female authors made the cut, and none of them cracked the top ten.

The Washington Post reacted with an article called “The key to literary success? Be a man — or write like one.” Salon.com responded in kind with “If you want to be a great writer, be a man.” Both articles were written by women, recalling advice from former college professors.

As I was reading both (valid) arguments that women get the shaft in publishing circles, I couldn’t help but compare the experiences of those women to the experiences of women in the fantasy genre. Sure, fantasy is full of epic male authors: Tolkien, Lewis, Jordan, Gaimen, Pratchett, Dahl. But fantasy also has its share of celebrated (and well-paid) female writers: Kurtz, Rice, Rowling, Weis, Bradley.

Is the fantasy genre simply more friendly to female writers?

I think so.

But why?

Let’s start by looking at the biggest bang (and bank account): J.K. Rowling.

By now, her personal journey is as well-known as that of of The Boy Who Lived. For example, that “K” in “J.K.” is not even her real name. When Bloomsbury bought Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, they feared that young boys wouldn’t want to read a fantasy tale by Joanne Rowling, so she adopted an androgynous “K.”

By the time Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire hit shelves, Rowling was the highest-profile author in the world, and everyone knew the “K” was for Kathleen. It didn’t matter that J.K. Rowling was a woman; what mattered was that she hurry back to her office and start writing about Hogwarts, Year Five.

Rowling also did another thing for female writers in the fantasy genre: she blurred the lines between children’s fiction and adult fiction. Women have always been trusted with cooking, cleaning and kids; so, the children’s publishing industry has historically been more accessible to females. During Harry Potter’s off-years, many adults went digging around in the children’s sections at their local bookstores, looking for an equally entrancing fantasy fix. And publishers paid attention.

But Rowling wasn’t the first woman to enjoy monetary success and critical praise for her fantasy writing. Before her, there were vampires — and three women who, er, brought them to life.

Marilyn RossBarnabas Collins series, Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles and Chelsea Quinn Yarbro’s Saint-German series changed the vampire genre. Under their pens, vampires became brooding, tragic, poetic heroes. And unlike the implicit sexual themes in vampire stories before theirs, Ross, Rice and Yarbro made it overt.

What they did for vampires, Marion Zimmer Bradley did for Arthurian Legend. Her Avalon series boldly turned Camelot on its head and examined it from the perspective of female narrators.

And what Bradley did for Arthurian Legend, Katherine Kurtz did for Medieval fantasy lit. And what Kurtz did for Medieval fantasy lit, Tanith Lee did for sorcery.

I think fantasy is more receptive to women writers because it has a long, proud history of financially successful female authors in nearly every subset of the genre. While most writers will tell you they want to bring fresh, engaging concepts to print, they will also tell you that it is much easier to get published if there’s a record of success with what you’re writing. To that end, it would be disingenuous to tell a female fantasy author that men won’t read her books simply because she is a woman.

Of course, financial success and excitement from publishers isn’t synonymous with critical acclaim. Even with the accomplishments of the women I mentioned — and the dozens I didn’t — last year’s Hugo Awards were awfully slim on female nominees. [Editor’s Note: This year was better.) But I’m still not going to cry sexism.

If you want to be a great fantasy writer, they key isn’t writing like a man; the key is writing rich, textured, deeply-imagined stories. As women continue to do just that, it will only be a matter of time before full parity comes to the genre.

Or you could take a shot at writing your main characters sparkly genitalia.

Stephanie Meyer isn’t exactly celebrated, but she certainly hasn’t gone broke writing about vampires.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Ask the Oracle: Are There Real-Life Boots of Springing? Who’s Worth More: Rowling or Meyer?

Tags: , , , ,


Have a question about something fantasy-related? Please send an email to thetorchonlineoracle@gmail.com and be sure and include your city and state and/or country.

Q: I know boots of Springing and Striding aren’t real — that they’re a D&D magic item. But it occurs to me that there might be some (non-magical) real-world counterpart. Is there? — Waylon, Portland OR

A: Yes: a brand of exercise equipment called Kangoo Boots (as opposed to “kangaroo boots,” I suppose, which are made from kangaroo fur and leather).

I was both fascinated by how these books work, but also vaguely disappointed that they don’t allow you to jump ten feet in the air:


While looking for a video of Kangoo boots, I also found this, which doesn’t quite correspond to any D&D spell that I can think of, but looks really, really fun nonetheless:

Q: Why remake The Sorcerer’s Apprentice? Seriously. — Urp, Vancouver, Canada

A: The Oracle agrees with you, but if it’s any consolation, the original Sorcerer’s Apprentice (which is, of course, a short film within the animated Disney classic Fantasia) is itself adapted from a 1797 poem, which had previously been turned into an 1897 symphony (this is the music used in Fantasia).

Where did the idea for the movie (which includes a riff on the Fantasia broom-and-flood sequence, which is also part of the poem) come from?

“The idea came to me and my friend Todd Garner,” says the film’s star, Nicolas Cage. “I was making another movie at the time, and I wanted to explore a more magical and fantastic realm where I could play a character who had mystical abilities. I shared these thoughts with Todd, and the next day, we hit on the perfect project: The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.”

So we’re now greenlighting movies based on the egotistical whims of inexplicably “bankable” movie stars like Nic Cage? That explains a lot, doesn’t it?

Considerably richer than God.

Q: Whose worth more: J.K. Rowling or Stephenie Meyer? — ApeGirl, Milwaukee, WI

A: While Stephenie Meyer has been far, far, far more successful than I ever would’ve imagined, and while she made an estimated $50 million dollars last year (for a total estimated wealth of well over $100 million), J.K. Rowling (who, it must be said, has been publishing books for almost a decade longer) is estimated by Forbes to have a fortune of a billion dollars.

Q: They can dress it up all the want, but when Galadriel, Elrond, and the rest of the elves “sailed over the Great Sea” to “Valinor,” that’s a euphemism, and they were really committing suicide, right? — M&M, Fort Wayne, IN

A: That’s, um, an unusual interpretation of things, but if that’s how you read the books, hey, what the hey?

Have a question about something fantasy-related? Please send an email to thetorchonlineoracle@gmail.com and be sure and include your city and state and/or country.

Looking to buy any of the projects mentioned in this article (or any other media)? Support TheTorchOnline.com by purchasing it through this link.

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

Bad Behavior has blocked 9731 access attempts in the last 7 days.