Warning: The following review contains spoilers for the “Mark of the Brotherhood” episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
So, the past couple of episodes have been real downers. Therefore, it’s refreshing that with “Mark of the Brotherhood,” Spartacus: Blood and Sand starts to return to form.
At this point, though it’s been shy of two months for us, time has marched along a tad quicker in the ludus, and Batiatus is ready for some new blood to bolster the ranks of his academy. He heads out to the market to bid on new gladiators, and after a brief bidding war with his rival Solonius, he ends up overpaying for a slew of fresh blood. He doesn’t mind, however, since he now has coin to spare, and he rather gets a kick out of showing up Solonius in public.
The new recruits arrive, and in an echo of the second episode, Doctore indoctrinates them into the ludus with his speech, only this time it’s Spartacus who provides the grace notes rather than Crixus. It seems old Sparty is really taking to his new identity as the Champion of Capua.
Ilithyia watches the goings on from the balcony with Lucretia and Batiatus, and by now her fetishistic enjoyment of the gladiators is so obvious that Lucretia suggests she becomes a patron to one of them. To further goad her, Batiatus orders all of the new recruits to disrobe, and we get a gander at what I imagine has to be one of the show’s notorious prosthetic penises. If I’m wrong, the actor playing the new Gaul slave has a lot to be proud of. A lot.
The major sub-plot running throughout is Crixus’ attempts to win back the favor of both Lucretia and Batiatus (though he uses very different methods for each, natch), and after seeing him bully around Spartacus and Varro for so long, it was gratifying to see him become the underdog.
In the scene where he challenges Spartacus to a fight, I was suddenly reminded how the show use to focus on heavy-metal-driven slow-motion fight scenes, and, in fact, that they were integral to its identity. But, as will happen, the show has evolved to focus more on the characters and less on the spectacle, so it was fun to see a bit of the old Spartacus return as Crixus and our champion threw down.
The show has also done a good job exploring the role of women in this society, and the bitchapalooza that ensued when Ilithyia brought her friends to the ludus was a fun, snarky diversion, while also setting up what will be an important plot point in the episodes to come.
I have to say, when the show began, I never imagined that Ilithyia would grow to be such a villain while her husband Glaber is largely absent, so the writers deserve credit for the ingenuity. The only character who is truly pure of heart is Spartacus, as many others, even Varro, have succumbed to ignoble desires, while Crixus, who began as a one-dimensional bully, is evolving into a sympathetic character.
The show deserves praise for taking chances, as much for its willingness to show the dark side of every character as its daring displays of violence and nudity. As I’ve stated before, it treads where other shows dare not. While it saddened me that Barca and Pietros are seemingly forgotten by every single person in the ludus, I guess I have to move on and realize that for those living in this world, an untimely death is as common as the sun rising in the morning.
Spartacus remains a kick-ass show. And wait until you see the next episode …
An interview with new Conan Jason Momoa (I’m still bitter they didn’t use my pick of Eric Bana) is up in which Mr. Momoa discusses how he plans to gain ten lbs of muscle for the role. That’s it? Taylor Lautner packed on 30 lbs of sheer abs to play Jacob Black and he’s only twelve years old! Okay, twelve and a half.
I never got into the movie Tron the way some people my age did, so I can’t really force myself to geek out over the trailer for the new film Tron: Legacy. It has that glossy black/chrome/neon aesthetic so many sci-fi movies seem to have these days, and some of the imagery reminds me of that god-awful Ultraviolet movie from a few years back. On the plus side, they’re apparently wielding some version of Xena’s signature weapon, the chakram, so uber-points for that. See it below:
Apparently, Disney changed the name of their upcoming Rapunzel movie to Tangled so it would appeal more to boys, who aren’t keen on seeing a movie with anything resembling a “princess” anywhere within 300 feet of the title. Aw, that’s adorable.
The Hollywood Reporter has an interesting little article about how The Hurt Locker beat out the more-successful-than-God 3D-tastic Avatar. I’m torn, because both movies were incredibly good. Personally, I think it’s because the Academy is comprised of ant-Na’vi bigots who just want to get their hands on some unobtanium, and are angry someone made a movie championing the Pandoran cause.
For those of you out there willing to forgive Hugh Jackman and company for the abominable Wolverine, they’re shooting the sequel in the near future, which is promised to be “very different” from the first film. Note they don’t say “better,” just different.
Last year I wrote an article about gigantomungous animals that exist in real life. Thankfully, I only had to write about the biggies that exist today, because Cracked has a list of 7 (thankfully) extinct giant versions of modern animals. Anyone who knows me knows that my one big weakness is bugs of any kind. Oh, god, I hate bugs, and the bigger they are, the more they creep me out. This list is going to give me nightmares for the rest of my life.
Continuing this unexpected thread of self-promotion, AfterElton.com has a new article up by yours truly concerning the greater ramifications of the deaths of Barca and Pietros on Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
Ever wanted to know what Iron Man might look like if the costume was designed by different artists? Well, now you can!
Details are emerging about “additions” to the story of the movie version of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader: it will reportedly include a search for “seven swords.” This actually doesn’t bug me, as the plot of this particular Narnia book is pretty darn slight. But yeah, I’m glad they cut the “new witch.”
And finally, while on the topic of Iron Man, Slashfilm has painstakingly went through the new trailer frame-by frame and spotted Scarlett Johansson’s (I will never be able to spell her name without looking it up) stunt double when performing a crazy lucha libre spinning headscissors takedown. Yeah, that’s right, I know my wrestling moves. What, I can’t have layers? Enjoy the trailer (it’s pretty awesome):
That was all I needed to know. With the show a solid hit (and having firmly won over most of us here at TheTorchOnline.com), I was eager to do a mid-season check-in with DeKnight, to find out exactly how the show ended up where it did — and get a sense where it’s going next.
TheTorchOnline: You have to be pleased with how the show has been received so far.
SD: Very pleased. Very pleased. It got off to a little bit of a rocky start. The reaction to the pilot was not as favorable as we’d hoped, but working on the show … we very quickly found our footing, and it became a much more complicated, intricate show. The pilot is pretty cut and dry.
TTO: I don’t think the pilot was representative of what the show became. It was the weakest episode.
SD: Exactly. I’ve been very, very please that people have stuck with it. The overriding comment I’ve seen on the internet is that each episode keeps getting better and better.
TTO: I think my favorite theme of the show is that this is a society infused with violence, in the ring, but also in the different social strata. In the palaces and in the streets, among Lucretia and her friends, it’s the same thing that’s going on in the gladiator ring. They’re all having these tournaments, just in different ways. Was there an “Ah ha!” moment when you realized the two halves of the show were two sides of the same coin?
SD: Oh yeah. I mean from the start we’d planned it that way, to mirror the violence in the arena with the violence in the upper strata of the Romans. Just with our research and talking to our consultants, it was just a fascinating culture where they were really raised from birth to not shy away from violence. It’s a republic, and eventually an empire, built on conquest. That’s deeply, deeply ingrained in the people.
Yes, there are some incredibly gory fights in the arena, but there’s also some incredibly violent stuff that goes on in the “civilized” arena of the Romans. You’ve seen in Episode 9 where things go shockingly awry.
TTO: It hasn’t aired yet, so I don’t want to give anything away, but it’s a great episode, with particularly interesting turnaround for Lucretia. Usually when someone is writing about Ancient Rome, they are trying to make a parallel, whether subtle or more obvious, between Ancient Rome and contemporary America. Is that a part of this show?
SD: A very, very subtle one. My first order of business is to tell a rollicking good story. My connection with the present and the past has always been that we went through a large economic downturn, and part of that resulted in something that’s been building for years, the squeezing out of the middle class. Basically, there are the rich and there are the poor. The middle class is slowly disappearing, and the wealth is concentrated among very few.
That’s the one thing I wanted to explore this season, and I think you’ve see it most with Batiatus. The drought is his economic downturn. Here’s a guy in the middle class trying to claw his way up into the upper class, willing to do anything he could to do that. Of course, the slave class, the poor that work for outrageously low wages in modern times, were actual slaves in ancient times with that kind of uprising and revolt against the system.
TTO: That’s one of the other things I like most about the show, the sort of Upstairs/Downstairs quality to it, where the slaves are obviously real people to the viewer, but they’re subhuman to the folks over them. Is that how you, as a contemporary writer, are making a judgment about these Roman characters, by showing us their society through the eyes of the slaves?
SD: Yeah, but at [a recent press event], I mentioned when we eventually bring in Marcus Crassus, we’re going to get a different viewpoint of slavery. Marcus Crassus was the biggest slave owner in Rome at the time and made his fortune.
But the thing about slaves, and the thing we couldn’t really explore and expand on this season because in the ludus they’re just slaves, but it wasn’t always just slavery as we imagine it, beaten and locked in a cage. A lot of slaves were highly skilled craftsmen and artisans, and they were basically working for the master. They had their own homes, they had their own families, but they were not technically free.
As we progress the story, and we bring in Marcus Crassus, I want to explore the other side of slavery in Ancient Rome, and actually give the Roman side of it. The fact is, without these slaves, the society would not have flourished, and without Roman society flourishing, where would modern civilization be?
I remember when I said this at [that press event], the next day I read on the internet, the headline was: “Steve DeKnight Puts A Positive Spin On Slavery.” That’s not at all what I’m saying. But realistically, not all slaves were beaten or tortured or mistreated in Rome.
TTO: One of the most shocking elements is the degree to which people accept the system. Ultimately, where you’re going is that one of them won’t accept the system and will try to overturn the system, but the degree to which the gladiators take on this idea that allowing yourself to be killed is honorable, and if you don’t do it, you’re shamed. Shocking from a modern perspective.
SD: Exactly. They’re so far into that system. For instance, take a look at Barca and Ashur. They are slaves, but they are allowed to go out unchained and do things for their master, and they come back. They don’t just disappear. That’s another mindset I found very interesting. They could just skip out, but they don’t.
TTO: The real chains are in your head, I guess.
SD: Exactly. And that’s something we’ll definitely explore as these seasons continue. Crixus is another great example. In Episode 5, Spartacus really grills him about why are you doing this? Crixus is a very interesting character for me, because he’s completely bought into the system, and by the end, he starts to realize how the system has destroyed him.
TTO: He was eventually Spartacus’s right hand man, wasn’t he?
SD: Yeah. Spartacus, Crixus and Oenomaus led the three factions. It was another interesting thing that I find looking forward, in designing this season, I didn’t want want Crixus and Spartacus to be buddy/buddy, chummy, let’s-go-out-together. These are two men who are trying to find common ground, but will never truly be friends.
Historically, if you look at the record, when they do break out, there was a lot of contention. It wasn’t one big happy band. Crixus sets his goal. Historically, they separate, then come back together. They weren’t always on the same page, which is very important. The last thing I want going in to Season 2 is Robin Hood, everybody together with their Merry Men. It wasn’t like that.
TTO: You’re writing Season 2 now? Where are you and what can we expect?
SD: Yes. We’re on Episode 3. It’s an interesting change. Anybody that knows the history of Spartacus obviously knows where this has to go. I always read on the internet, based on Rob’s work with Hercules and Xena, everybody says, “Well, Rob doesn’t care about history.” That’s absolutely not true. Rob does care about history. We are following the broad strokes of the Spartacus story. We can’t be slaves to every detail of what happened. I’m sure you’ve heard many times: We bend history, but we try not to break it.
But this is the story of Spartacus, which is a slave rebellion, so we will be exploring that.
TTO: Do you have a five year plan? A seven year plan? How long is it going to take you to tell this whole story?
SD: I have a five to seven year plan. Definitely enough for five. It could go longer, depending on Starz and the viewership, but definitely at least five planned out. There are so many great moments in the Spartacus story and in history that I’ve never fully seen explored. I also really want the chance to explore the “villain’s” side. The Romans didn’t think they were the villains. They thought Spartacus was the villain. That’s something I really want to explore.
Moving forward, and this will be gradual thing, is not all Romans are bad. Even Batiatus, yes, he’s bad, but he has many different shades to him.
TTO: He has a point of view, but boy, when he promised Spartacus that he’d be reunited with his wife… It hits you like a slug in the gut when you realize the true evilness of that character. His code of honor is such that he’s technically fulfilling the promise he made to Spartacus even as he’s killing this guy’s wife.
SD: Batiatus is looking at a big picture. The thing I love about that character is that he is consumed by trying to get out of his father’s shadow and not being the guy that ruins the family business. That, for him, is just the overreaching goal. It becomes more and more prominent as we go on in the series.
TTO: I confess that I’ve already been shocked many times by this show.
SD: The fantastic thing about Starz is that they let us go to places a lot of other shows won’t go to.
TTO: As a result, the experience for the viewer is that you really don’t know what’s going to happen. Anything can happen, and that’s so rare to be able to say about television.
SD: Anything can happen and anybody can die. We definitely continue that moving on.
Entertainment Weekly is reporting that Andy Whitfield, the star of the Starz TV show Spartacus: Blood and Sand, has been diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and that, as a result, production on the second season of the show will be delayed.
“I’m receiving excellent care, and am feeling strong, positive and determined with an army of support behind me,” said Whitfield in a statement.
Production on the second season of the show, which had been renewed by Starz even before the series debuted, was set to begin later this month.
Have a question about something fantasy-related? Please send an email to thetorchonlineoracle@gmail.com and be sure and include your city and state and/or country.
Q: As I understand it, the real-life Spartacus only lived a short time after leading his famous Roman slave rebellion. Assuming Spartacus leads the rebellion next season, doesn’t that mean the show can only be three seasons long, at most? — Mark, Milwaukee, WI
A: Not surprisingly, not much is known about Spartacus in his pre-gladiator days, but the rebellion he led took place in 73 B.C., and Spartacus died in 71 B.C.
Robert Tapert (left) and Steven DeKnight
Or did he? Contrary to the famous ending of the Stanley Kubrick movie, Spartacus’ body was never found — an historical truth that the producers of the new Starz TV show Spartacus: Blood and Sand could certainly exploit.
In any event, there’s no reason why a “season” of the show has to correspond to a year of real time.
What do the producers themselves say?
“Anyone who knows the history of Spartacus obviously knows where this has to go,” Spartacus creator Steven DeKnight tells the Oracle. “There’s been a lot of talk based on [co-creator] Rob [Tapert's] work with Xena and Hercules — everybody says, ‘Well, Rob doesn’t care about history.’ But that’s absolutely not true. Rob does care about history, and we are following the broad strokes of the Spartacus story. We can’t be slaves to every detail — we bend history, we try never to break it.”
So how long will the show go?
“I have a five-to-seven year plan,” DeKnight says. “Definitely enough for five — it could go longer, depending on Starz and the viewership. Definitely at least five planned out. There’s so many great moments in Spartacus’ story, in history, that I’ve never fully seen explored.”
Q: I know we’re supposed to be in an “animation renaissance,” but I think I’m done with animated movies for a while. I tried to sit through the Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs recently, but found absolutely unwatchable — a hyper-frenetic mess on one hand (for kids, I guess) with a bunch of stupid, but ironic quips (for the adults, supposedly). And it got good reviews! Obviously, Up was night-and-day better, but even that struck me as muddled in the middle and just generally over-rated. What do you think? — Madge, Baton Rouge, LA
A: We’ve written before about the animated movie renaissance, but the Oracle has come to reluctantly agree with you.
Disney started the renaissance with The Little Mermaid in 1989, but soon their films started to blur together: a story about a plucky, but ostracized outsider must learn to “own” his or her difference into order to end up saving the kingdom, village, or savanna — all set to truly memorable showtunes.
Two studios inherited Disney’s artistic mantle, furthering the renaissance: Pixar, which had a break-out hit with Toy Story, and Dreamworks, which had its first big success with Shrek.
But just like Disney’s films became derivative of themselves, most animated movies currently seem to follow either the Pixar/Toy StoryShrek formula or the Dreamworks/Shrek one.
The vast majority (like Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs) take the now-insufferable Shrek route: a gimmicky central story with hyper, ironic pop-culture-spouting hipster main characters, usually voiced by celebrities — a shtick modeled after Robin Williams‘ hammy, but memorable turn as the genie in Disney’s Aladdin.
This formula got old three Ice Age sequels ago. Sitting through Jim Carrey in Dr. Seuss’ Horton Hears a Who, the Oracle contemplated killing himself.
By contrast, Pixar (which is now owned by Disney) tells much more timeless stories: usually complicated morality tales involving sad or ethically compromised main characters. Examples includeFinding Nemo, The Incredibles, WALL-E, and Ratatouille.
In the Oracle’s opinion, the Pixar model is a thousand times better than the Dreamworks’ one.
But I agree with you that Up, while beautifully drawn and acted, was ultimately muddled and overrated.
Q: There was this TV show around ten years ago about this guy who had the newspaper delivered to him (by a cat) a day early. He’d spend the episode trying to prevent the bad things in the newspaper from happening. Do you know the name of that show? — ScreamingMonkez, Birmingham,
A: You’re thinking of Early Edition, about a Chicago man who received a copy of the Chicago Sun-Times a day early. The show, which stared Friday Night Lights‘ Kyle Chandler and Fisher Stevens, originally ran on CBS from September 1996 to May 2000. ABC Family later ran reruns.
Incidentally, Stevens won an Oscar last night for a documentary he produced, The Cove. Yes, that’s why that guy looked so familiar!
Have a question about something fantasy-related? Please send an email to thetorchonlineoracle@gmail.com and be sure and include your city and state and/or country.
Warning: The following review contains spoilers for the “Great and Unfortunate Things” episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
Okay, so last week’s episode was a bummer. We know that.
But it was also an example of the kind of terrific writing we’ve come to expect on Spartacus. Was it upsetting to see Barca and Sura killed off? Of course. But it also made for the kind of intense drama that will keep us coming back for more.
I won’t lie — this episode was even more of a bummer than last week. But I can’t fault the powers that be behind the series; they promised a shocking television show, and they’re delivering.
It almost seems that the writers are coming to the table with this philosophy: make life as hellish as possible for, well, every single character. Considering that the majority of the cast are slaves who are forced into life-or-death matches every week, that takes some doing.
I didn’t realize how emotionally attached I had become to Pietros. Seeing him wandering around the ludus, a lost soul who believes he was abandoned by his one true love, was bad enough, but then on top of this he becomes the favorite victim of another gladiator, one who routinely beats and rapes him. When he started appearing with swollen black eyes and cuts, it set off every protective instinct in my body.
It was not really such a surprise, then, when the character hangs himself, but it did make me shake my head and think what a shame it was to see yet another victimized young gay man end his life on television. I know many fans were looking forward to the possibility of Pietros finding an inner strength and joining Spartacus in his eventual rebellion. Now, it just seems a waste.
But that aside, this particular episode gets only three torches — a low for the series so far — because the storyline was very meandering, with nothing really to drive it forward. Sure, there was the fight in the arena looming on the horizon, but at this point we’ve both been there and done that, and there was no suspense upon learning that Spartacus will be fighting six men at once because, well, check out the title of the show. Are any of us that worried about him?
To be fair, it does set up nicely what I imagine might be a future storyline, in which Doctore discovers the truth behind Barca’s “departure,” but I’ve seen the next two episodes and that doesn’t factor into either of them. But I will say this — the next two episodes are pretty awesome.
Even at its lowest point, I’m consistently impressed with Spartacus, because it doesn’t remind me of any other show, and that’s one of the greatest compliments I can give. Sure, it looks a little like 300 and Rome, but do any of its storylines really seem similar? Its premise may be reminiscent of Gladiator, but I can’t imagine two projects being more different.
Spartacus is truly its own animal, and that is a remarkable accomplishment.
Warning: The following review contains spoilers for the “Delicate Things” episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
Yeah … so …
I have to be honest, this is actually kind of complicated a review for me to write. Tell you what, I’m going to warn you in advance. I have a soapbox next to me that I’m going to climb on in a minute. But I’ll let you know when so you can skip over that part if you want.
Previously, we saw Crixus and Spartacus whoop some major ass on Theocles, the “Shadow of Death,” and even though Crixus could barely keep his insides from going outside, Spartacus was relatively unscathed, and so Batiatus christens him the new “Champion of Capua.”
Batiatus tells him that he found his wife, Sura, and that she’s en route to the villa even as they speak, set to arrive in about two days. Spartacus immediately begins plotting his escape.
The big subplot is that in the last episode, Ashur and Barca made a bet on who would win the fight, with Ashur wagering unwisely on Theocles. He owes Barca a lot of money, and Barca means to collect, and fast. Why the hurry? It turns out he hates being a gladiator, and just wants to buy his freedom and that of his lover, Pietros, so the two of them can build a life together without all the killing.
Ashur sets things up so it looks like Barca betrayed Batiatus, and — literally — stabs Barca in the back, followed by a gang of palace guards. Batiatus himself gets the killing stroke, slitting Barca’s throat.
When Sura’s cart arrives, Spartacus is distraught to find his wife has been attacked on the road, and she dies in his arms. Even more disturbing is the fact that Batiatus arranged her death.
Okay, soap box time.
So, here’s the thing. I appreciate that this show goes where no other show on television dares to tread. I’ve expressed that in most of my episode reviews. Even when I don’t particularly love the individual episode (”The Thing in the Pit” comes to mind) I still gave props to the writing team for their bold audacity.
I hold true to that opinion still, and furthermore, the writing on this episode was excellent. The sense of foreboding that invaded every frame, that feeling that something bad is going to happen, was prevalent from almost the first frame. Andy Whitfield is a great actor, and John Hannah as Batiatus actually scared me.
But as a gay dude (I know, shocking), this one was kind of hard to take. With Barca and Pietros, this show blasted every single television show out of the water with not only visibility but originality. When’s the last time you saw a gay character on television seen as one of the deadliest and most ferocious warriors known to man?
With Barca, they had created a character unlike any other character ever seen on television before, and that they were so unapologetic about it earned them a lot of street cred in my opinion. So losing that character was tough. I didn’t even realize how attached I was to him until he was horrifically killed by a roomful of men. And this was the big finish:
Okay, jumping off the soap box now.
As I said, this episode did set up a sense of tension that seemed to run through the entire hour, and my personal politics aside, the only reason it didn’t rank the full five torches was it lacked that sense of aww-yeah-adventure that past episodes, particularly “Shadow Games,” had.
I know the whole point is that the show takes place within the confines of the ludus, but remember that feature film quality the first episode had, for the very reason that most of it was out in the wild? I long to see that again, and given the actual history of Spartacus, I have a feeling we will before the show gets too claustrophobic.
Warning: The following review contains spoilers for the “Shadow Games” episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
One would think that the formula of lots of gladiators training in an arena, Spartacus lamenting the loss of his wife, Batiatus and Lucretia scheming their respective schemes, and the plot leading up to a boss fight would be stale by the fifth episode, but Spartacus: Blood and Sand is still managing to keep things fresh. The latest episode gives us a much-needed insight into a character we’ve seen a lot of (nudity pun intended) but don’t really know that well: Crixus.
The hook of this episode is that the Magistrate is interested in using one of Batiatus’ men in the main event, or Primus, of his latest games. One fighter has already been chosen, belonging to Batiatus’ rival, Solonius.
Batiatus, naturally, chooses his best fighter, Crixus, but is distraught to learn that his man will be fighting Theocles, the “Shadow of Death.” (Although, unless my Greek is rustier than I thought, I think his name translates to “Glory of the gods,” but any brainiacs can feel free to correct me in the comments.)
Theocles is a villain of whom we’ve only heard tall tales referring to his gigantic height and invulnerability, and the only man who ever survived a fight with him was the trainer, Doctore.
Solonius, a mustache-twirling villain if ever there was one, suggests Crixus be joined by Spartacus, and Batiatus agrees. (Spartacus’ friend Varro teases him later about how they make a cute couple, so I’m copyrighting the name “Spartacrix” right now.) The problem? Crixus hates Spartacus somethin’ fierce.
But why does he hate him? Up until now we weren’t sure, other than he was a bully/antagonist, and so it’s his job to hate the main character. But as it turns out, there’s a bit of depth there.
In a review of a previous episode, I talked about how the gladiators talked big about how they were gods among men (with Crixus the most vocal), but we could tell that it was just a cover so they didn’t have to admit they were slaves. Well, once Spartacus and Crixus learn they have to work together, Crixus starts to go on the familiar tirade, and Spartacus calls him on it, saying they’re all just slaves. And naturally Crixus responds by attacking him.
This ep had an incredible character moment for Illyithia, a character who had so far been shown to be little more than a flighty airhead. She is the wife of Glaber, the main villain, and we caught a glimpse of the power she wields when she and Lucretia summon Spartacus and Crixus to their chamber for a private viewing.
As she stalks around Spartacus and tells him how she’ll delight in telling her husband of his death at the hands of Theocoles, she stops being flighty and starts being very dangerous. Then Spartacus leaves and she’s back to her old self. It’s a great moment, and it made me finally like Illyithia.
It should also be said this was definitely the sexiest episode so far, even though it didn’t boast the most sex scenes, and it was without a doubt the most homoerotic. The brief loving exchange between Barca and Pietros was far sexier with its chaste kiss than the full-on scene of carnality we saw last week, because with an emotional exchange, we’re starting to connect with their characters.
I mentioned earlier that Crixus attacks Spartacus, but I failed to mention this fight took place in the baths while they were both completely naked, and it has to go down as the most obviously homoerotic fight in the history of celluloid.
The power play between the genders is fascinating. We have a notion that in the ancient world, women were automatically subservient to men, but the scene in which Lucretia and Illyithia are ogling Crixus is interesting because even though he could kill them both with his bare hands in seconds, he has to do everything they say.
Illyithia commands him to take off his loincloth and stand there naked, and when he complies you see on his face how he’s fighting his feelings of humiliation. And of course Naevia, the slave he is in love with and who loves him in return, has to stand there and do nothing while all of this is going on. There are a lot of layers at play here.
The fight against Theocles was exciting, but the least interesting aspect of the plot, which means the writers are doing a great job populating this world with people we care about. (Although I was giddy to see the blood spatter effect return.)
One final thought: I was describing the series to a friend the other day, and for the first time I articulated something that I realize I should have said a while ago, regarding Lucy Lawless. There are iconic characters, and then there’s Xena, who stands mountains above the rest. But when viewing Spartacus, not once do I think, “Hey, it’s Xena!” I’m just wondering what mischief Lucretia will get up to next.
It hard not to be a little taken by Peter Mensah, the striking 6′ 3 1/2″ actor who was born in Ghana and raised in Britain and Canada. Not surprisingly, he is frequently cast as someone authoritative, like the military officers he played in The Incredible Hulk and Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles.
Now he’s in perhaps his highest-profile role yet, that of Doctore, the kick-ass, but mysterious trainer at the gladiator school in Spartacus: Blood and Sand.
Last summer, at a press event promoting the series, I ran into Mensah. I hadn’t yet seen any of the finished product, but I couldn’t resist pulling him aside for a few questions.
Question: What will viewers be most surprised to learn about Doctore this season?
Peter Mensah: The biggest question mark will probably be, “What’s his story?” And it does evolve very interestingly. It starts in a certain manner, and as the series evolves, [co-creator] Steve [DeKnight] has a really interesting, sort of onion peel way to get to what his story really is.
And by the end of the season, you’ll find it opens the door to a very, very interesting character.
Q: You’re working with a lot of people who have all worked together on previous projects, like Xena: Warrior Princess. What’s it like for you, coming in new and working with folks who are so tight?
PM: One of the great aspects is actually when you get included in a family. They’ve gone out of their way to make me feel really comfortable.
It’s a nice thing to suddenly recognize that you’ve been recognized. They trust your work. They hired me without auditioning. They basically put in a call. It was a choice between this and [another project], and this won, hands-down!
Q: Since CGI is such an important part of the show, how different is the finished product from what it’s like for you on the set?
PM: It’s very different, but that’s the key to green-screen work. It was the same on 300 [in which Mensah also had a role]. I remember seeing the initial renderings, and then watching the process, and then a few months later, seeing finished product.
So you work with the knowledge that there will a lot more done, and it’ll look fleshier by the time that it’s done. You work in a sort of stark environment typically, and it really requires to trust everyone to get it done.
I’m thrilled with the way it’s turned out.
Q: There must be so much to keep track of. Do you or the director ever have to sacrifice the performance a bit in order to get something technically right?
PM: No, because if the performance doesn’t work, ultimately it’ll actually unseat the piece. So we’ve all had an understanding that no matter what we do, the performances actually cement the work itself.
No concerns that way at all.
Q: So you’ve set up shop in New Zealand [where the show is filmed]?
Peter as "Messenger" in 300
PM: Well, I’ve taken an apartment, but there hasn’t been much time to much except work at this point. Five months, a month of training, four months of shooting, and a little bit more to go.
Q: A lot of people are making parallels between Ancient Rome and modern-day America. Do you think that’s a part of the show?
PM: I think the understanding really is that there is no issue that’s original. The Roman Empire was built on slavery. A privileged class versus on an underclass. This is nothing new. You can always find references to the modern-day situation in something like this.
Have a question about something fantasy-related? Ask the Oracle! (Be sure to include your first name and the city, state, and/or country you are writing from.)
Q: What happened to the end of Close Encounters of the Third Kind? I could swear there was a re-release in the 80s where we go inside the alien spacecraft at the end of the movie — but the DVD ends where the original theatrical release did. Am I misremembering? I can’t believe they’d cut that part out! — Nameth, Calgary, Canada
A: No, you’re remembering correctly. The movie originally came out in late 1977, but the director, Steven Spielberg, was unhappy with the edit, as he felt he’d been rushed to make an early release date. The studio, Columbia Pictures, agreed to let him do a re-edit which they would re-release, but only on the condition that he shot new scenes for the end, featuring the “inside” of the ship. They figured this would be a great way to get people who’d seen the film already back into theaters.
And this is exactly what Spielberg did — shooting new scenes to the tune of $2.5 million — and it was released to much fanfare as Close Encounters of the Third Kind: The Special Edition in 1980.
But Spielberg greatly regretted those interior scenes — he felt that what people imagined about the inside of the ship was better than what could ever be shown, and that he should have left it a mystery.
So when he re-edited the film again for the 1998 Collectors Edition (which is the movie in the current DVD release), he kept some of the new footage from the 1980 reshoot, but not the inside-of-the-ship scenes.
Those “deleted” scenes are still available, however, on the second DVD of the Collectors Edition.
Q: I recently watched Rosemary’s Baby (good movie!) and was struck by the haunting theme music. Any idea how that came about? — Mason, La Joya, CA
A: It’s perfect, isn’t it? The haunting, dream-like lullaby is reminiscent of motherhood, but the reverb and quivering strings, not to mention Farrow’s feeble, resigned, off-key humming, imply something more, something far darker — like the singer is not entirely in her right mind, like she has been drugged or is in the grips of something she can’t control (both of which describe poor Rosemary in the movie).
The tune was written by polish composer, Krzysztof Komeda, who wrote the scores for several early movies by Roman Polanski (the director of Rosemary’s Baby). Reportedly, Komeda had originally intended to have a professional singer do it, but the singer in question asked for too much money, so they decided to use Farrow. As with so many things done seemingly by happenstance, that choice made the song, and helped make the movie, a classic.
Alas, Komeda, also an influential jazz pianist, died later the same year that the movie was released.
Q: Wouldn’t a genie get awfully bored stuck inside a lamp for thousands of years? — Molly, Bend, OR
A: The story of Aladdin and his magic lamp comes, of course, from One Thousand and One Nights, the ancient collection of Middle Eastern and South Asian folk tales. But the original story is not quite the Disney version.
As in the Disney version, poor Aladdin is recruited by an evil sorcerer to retrieve a magic lamp from a booby-trapped cave and is double-crossed by the wizard, trapping him inside. Aladdin accidentally summons a genie by rubbing a magic ring, not the lamp itself. The genie helps Aladdin escape.
Later, Aladdin’s mother accidentally rubs the lamp, summoning a more powerful genie. But again, the genie (or djinn, a magical creature from another dimension) is simply magically bound to the object, not literally inside it.
The whole idea that the genie was inside the lamp came later, as the story was adapted and retold many, many times, by people not familiar with Islamic culture — or the mythology of the djinn.
Have a question about something fantasy-related? Ask the Oracle! (Be sure to include your first name and the city, state, and/or country you are writing from.)
Much of the new Starz series Spartacus: Blood and Sand is famously shot using green-screen technology, where sets and backgrounds are not “real,” but are instead created by CGI.
So what of the other much-talked-about aspect of the series, the show’s vaunted sex scenes and female and male nudity? How real are those?
First, ask yourself: do you really want to know? But if you’re not worried about it spoiling the illusion, read on!
Some of the nudity is absolutely “real.” Those really are Lucy Lawless’s breasts, and many of the extras are obviously really naked.
But some of it is also, well, the magic of television.
Lawless made a big impact at the Television Critics Association conference in July when she told reporters she’d been fitted for a “merkin,” or pubic wig — a red one at that. At the time, not yet finished with the show’s twelve-episode shoot, she said it hadn’t yet been used — but that it might be.
Then again, she implied, there might be bottomless scenes where she wouldn’t use it all
And what of the male nudity? It seems that some of the actors were a little bashful about their, um, size, so the costumers created — there’s no other way to say this — a prosthetic penis. Hilariously, it was dubbed “the Kirk Douglas,” after the star of the original Spartacus movie.
As to which actors did or didn’t wear it, “We can’t give away our trade secrets,” Robert Tapert told reporters.
“We have one person is the cast who insists on being naked,” Lucy Lawless joked to EW’s Michael Ausiello in July. “And we’re like, ‘Bold choice.’ Nobody’s really asking, but if you insist, we’ll shoot it.”
But she didn’t specify that cast member’s name.
As for Andy Whitfield, who plays Spartacus, will he be fully naked at any point this season?
Whitfield implied to Chelsea Handler on the Chelsea Latelytalk show that while the character of Spartacus gets naked, the actor himself does not; he used a body double for the scenes.
“They had to search the world for the right … size,” he joked.
And what of the show’s sexual activity itself? Is any of that real?
Nope, that’s all pure acting.
“The sex scenes are always choreographed,” Lawless told reporters just last month. “[There's]’s always a layer [between the actors]. There’s no skin on skin contact apart from the kissing. So, it’s pretty standardized. And then what you think you are seeing in the final cut, it was pretty controlled.”
But Lawless was quick to point out that the sex in Spartacus is anything but porn. “When there’s a sex scene … it is about something else,” she said. “Otherwise, it would be on the Playboy Channel. This is not soft porn.”
“Everything I’ve read, [Rome] was a very visceral place both in its regards to sex and its regards to violence,” co-creator Steven DeKnight told the same group of reporters. “You’ll see some background sex going on. That’s obviously a part of the bigger scene, but once our main characters — there is always something else going on in the sex scene. It’s a discussion, it’s a power play, it’s exploration of love. It’s never just for the sex or titillation.”