Tag Archive | "Kings"

From the Palantir! (A Fantasy News Round-Up)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


  • A major update on director Guillermo Del Toro’s upcoming film version of The Hobbit, coming in 2010 and 2011: we’ve known for a while that there would be two films, but previously the plan was thought to be that the first film would cover the events of The Hobbit, while the second film would pull events from The Simirilian and other sources and “fill the gap” between the end of The Hobbit and the start of Rings. But Empire Magazine spoke to both Del Toro and Peter Jackson, who is producing, and it now sounds like it will be one continuous story. “We’ve decided to have The Hobbit span the two movies, including the White Council and the comings and goings of Gandalf to Dol Guldur,” Del Toro said. “We decided it would be a mistake to try to cram everything into one movie,” added Jackson. “The essential brief was to do The Hobbit, and it allows us to make The Hobbit in a little more style, if you like, of the [LOTR] trilogy.” I suspect the story will still primarily be that of The Hobbit (just with more detail), but speculation is rampant as to which actors from the LOTR films could return for cameos.
  • Filming has wrapped on Centurion (photo, right), the first in a wave of movies set in the ancient world, inspired by the success of 300. It tells the story of a small band of Roman warriors left behind enemy lines after their garrison is destroyed. Of all the 300 rip-offs announced so far, this one seems the most blatant. Still, it’s directed by the guy who did The Descent, which was fairly decent, and one of the producers gave us Slumdog Millionaire, which was brilliant.
  • I thought Kings, the modern-day retelling of the King David story, was terrific, but it looks like no one else did. After moving it to the black hole of Saturday night, NBC is pulling the show from their schedule until this summer when they’ll burn off the unaired eps before (most likely) letting it die.
  • David Slade, the director of 30 Days of Night, will direct Eclipse, the third Twilight book, due in 2010. (About a Boy/The Golden Compass director Chris Weitz is directing the second installment.) Slade is currently directing Neverwhere, a fantasy for Jim Henson Productions.
  • Evan Rachel Wood has been cast in a “major” role as a “vampire queen” on HBO’s True Blood.
  • Peter Jackson talks about his upcoming adaptation of The Lovely Bones (out December 10th): ” I think my partner, Fran Walsh, put it best when she said The Lovely Bones is about the triumph of a loving and generous heart over an empty one. It’s about a young girl who refuses to let the tragedy and injustice of her death define her life.”

The Verdicts Are In: “Watchmen” and “Kings” are Mostly Tanking

Tags: , , , ,


Viewers aren’t responding to either of two recent fantasy-esque projects, the superhero movie Watchmen and NBC’s modern-day retelling of the King David story, Kings.

In movie theaters, Race to Witch Mountain, a movie debut, easily beat Watchmen in its second week of theatrical release: $25 million to $18.1 million. Even worse, the $140 million superhero production saw its revenue plunge 67% from the weekend before — worse than every previous superhero movie that had debuted over $50 million. Among all comic book adaptations, only Hulk and Hellboy II: The Golden Army had steeper drops.

Meanwhile, on TV, Kings‘ overnight ratings (which are not final) were disastrous: the show drew a mere 6 million viewers, making it NBC’s second worst premiere of the season (after Chopping Block). It didn’t even do well in either of the coveted 18-34 or 18-49 demographics. Ratings were akin to NBC’s fall fantasy-esque flop Crusoe.

Kings was an expensive show to produce and market, so it’s unlikely that NBC will pull the plug immediately. The show was given an initial order of 13 episodes, most of which have probably been produced. But unless ratings rise dramatically, it’s unlikely the show will continue beyond the episodes that have been filmed, and we may not even see all of them aired on NBC.

Meanwhile, a sequel to Watchmen was always doubtful; the movie is an adaptation of a popular graphic novel, and both the novel and the movie have a very definite ending. But the box-office plunge probably means no prequel or Watchmen-related movies will even be considered.

Review: All Hail “Kings,” TV’s Terrific New Fantasy Show!

Tags: , , , ,



Five Torches (Out of Five)

The new NBC series Kings, debuting Sunday in a two-hour movie, is top-notch television — smart, original, and thoroughly engrossing – and it will end up reshaping the television landscape in much the way fantasy-esque shows such as Lost and Buffy the Vampire Slayer did.

The first half of the above sentence is definitely true. The second half may be true if American audiences are willing to give this brilliant, but daring new show a chance.

But that’s a big “if.” TV audiences have never seen anything quite like Kings.

Kings is a retelling of the biblical story of King David, set in an alternate time-line where medieval kingdoms coexist with modern technology. In this alternate universe, the king has a “court” in a glass skyscraper. And “petitions to the king” coexist with cell-phones and hand grenades.

“King of all I survey,” King Silas (Deadwood’s Ian McShane) says at one point, “and I still can’t find an office chair that doesn’t give me back spasms.”

“I grew up reading comics and there’s sort of a shorthand vocabulary for people who are used to alternate universe stuff,” says Kings creator Michael Green, who worked previously on Heroes. “But one of the challenges or sort of fun parts of this show, trying to get it off the ground, is explaining it to people who are not. Most people, they ask me questions and I say, ‘Give it five minutes and if you still have a problem, you can call me on the phone at home.’ Generally after five minutes they understand the physics of the world.”

Sure enough, the language of the show is an interesting blend of contemporary and “arch.” A courtly scribe even follows the king, writing hagiography — on a mobile electronic device, of course.

In the world of Kings, King Silas was chosen, apparently by God, to rule. But an endless war has sapped the kingdom’s resolve, and corruption threatens to undermine the palace from within.

Enter David, a humble but handsome young soldier who makes a name for himself defeating an “impenetrable” enemy tank – called, appropriately enough, “Goliath.”

Is Silas destined to be replaced by the new king? As in the biblical story of David, even God seems to think so. But Silas isn’t going down without a fight.

The characters in Kings are all, in a way, cliches: the arrogant, tyrannical king; the bitter, scheming queen; the virginal, but plucky princess; the scheming, entitled prince; and – most of all — the charmed “golden” hero who arises from hardscrabble origins, but who is destined to be the “true” heir to the throne.

But despite its modern-day setting, Kings exists in a fantasy, mythical world. Its “clichés” are really archetypes.

The whole point of Kings – part of the reason why I found it such daring, interesting television — is that it presents these “classic,” even biblical characters and situations, but then subverts them with the present-day setting and modern sensibilities.

At one point, David (Christopher Egan), teases the princess, saying, “Princessing is hard work, huh?”

“Health reform, actually,” this post-feminist princess says, wryly pointing out where her true priorities lie.

The prince, meanwhile, has a very contemporary secret that puts him at odds with his father,who believes sacrifices must be made for the throne (although the hypocritical king definitely has a few secrets of his own).

“I have been writing television long enough to realize you have to give credit to your audience because you write for the audience you hope are watching it, which are people who are willing to pay attention and lean forward and not be doing three other things,” Kings creator Green says. “You write shows for people who get invested in them enough to pay attention and sort of learn the rules, and one thing I enjoy doing is not giving it all away in the first  — like something that you sort of parse out slowly over time.”

Is there enough of a mass audience for such an unusual, original show — one that really does require the viewers full attention? I hope there is, but part of me worries there isn’t — especially given the backlash to last week’s complicated Watchmen.

Will Kings rule? We’ll know the answer soon enough.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3436 access attempts in the last 7 days.