Quantcast

Episode Review (1-1): THE WALKING DEAD Looks to be Like Nothing Else on Television

Posted on 31 October 2010 by Brent Hartinger, Editor


Five Torches (Out of Five)

Warning: This review contains spoilers for the “Days Gone Bye” episode of The Walking Dead.

When was the last time there was a post-apocalyptic TV series? Has there ever been a post-apocalyptic TV series? Because I honestly can’t think of any. TV is a mass market medium — the original mass market medium — and definitely not one to dwell on the dark side.

I think it speaks pretty accurately to how hopeless and depressed people feel these days that we’re finally seeing such a series right now.

And they didn’t pull any punches, did they? When was the last time you saw a child killed on TV — by the good guy no less? Sure, it was a zombie-child, but seeing the actual killing — in the first five minutes — speaks to the daring tone of this show.

Zombies may have been done to death in the movies and in fiction, but this show truly looked and felt like something different.

One reason why is surely because it’s the work of film director Frank Darabont, who created the series and wrote and directed this pilot.

Clearly, Darabont had the clout to be able to do whatever the hell he wanted. (And I’m sure it helped that cable channels like AMC actually encourage quality programming, as opposed to dumbing everything down for the widest possible audience.)

I loved that the episode got right to the point, both before and after the opening tease, even as it also varied the tone — something that made the moments of incredible intensity and suspense seem even that much more heart-wrenching.

The economy of the storytelling was extraordinary. They didn’t bother telling us things we already know and haven’t already seen in other zombie projects. And when it came to communicating important info, they couldn’t have done it any better than that scene with the half-corpse crawling along the grass: it told us everything we needed to know about the new world Rick was now in and, later when he goes back to put it out of its misery, everything we need to know about Rick.

Meanwhile, the episode had many other moments of incredible creepiness:

  • Rick waking up, confused and disoriented, into a world of “walking dead.” It was similar to the opening of 28 Days Later, but felt completely different too.
  • The young boy seeing the return of his mother the zombie outside the house.
  • The inevitable “crowd” of zombies in Atlanta and their attack. (His escape from the attack up into the tank was pretty cool too.)
  • The closing scene of the horse being devoured — to music, no less!

My few quibbles:

  • Rick has nice period of confusion, but then he seemed to adapt to the reality of a zombie apocalypse pretty quickly — too quickly. I’m all for moving the story forward, but I just didn’t buy this.
  • It was a great and classic set-up for the entire show when Rick finds evidence that his family left in a hurry (and, therefore, may still be alive), but I thought they squandered that by telling us too quickly that they were, in fact, alive.

Truthfully, I’ve long since had my fill of zombies, and I wasn’t particularly looking forward to this show. But Darabont is clearly a storytelling master, and he has created something here that feels genuinely different from anything else I’ve seen on TV.

I’ll definitely be watching.

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter.


Similar Posts:

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

7 Responses to “Episode Review (1-1): THE WALKING DEAD Looks to be Like Nothing Else on Television”

  1. Lucy says:

    This looks interesting, and it’s starting in the UK soon, so I won’t end up too far behind.

    We had Survivors back in the 70s (and the recent remake) which focused on the aftermath of a deadly epidemic, and was unrelentingly grim.

    • Vincent Austin says:

      This is very similar to the Survivors remake (I never saw the original). Throw zombies into Survivors (and add a lot to the budget) and you have this show.

      The big difference is that this show had 8.1 million viewers for the first night (that is a LOT for a cable show). If it can maintain numbers anywhere close to that, it will run for years.

  2. Ashley says:

    Both Battlestar Galacticas were post-apocalyptic, as was the short-lived Jericho. I’m sure there have been others as well.

    • I don’t think BATTLESTAR counts — sci-fi’s a different animal (less disturbing in a completely different universe and civilization). But you’re right about JERICO! Thanks. ;-)

      • Ashley says:

        Aww, BSG totally counts! Just because it’s not OUR society that’s post-apocalyptic . . .

        While I was watching The Walking Dead last night, I thought how much it reminded me of the way I felt watching BSG for the first time, and that was a point in its favor. All that naked terror and uncertainty is delicious.

Bad Behavior has blocked 10721 access attempts in the last 7 days.